Return-Path: Received: from merit-proxy01.merit.edu ([207.75.116.193]:57732 "EHLO merit-proxy01.merit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756Ab1G2TNf (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:13:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:13:41 -0400 From: Jim Rees To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, peter honeyman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/27] add block layout driver to pnfs client Message-ID: <20110729191341.GC23061@merit.edu> References: <1311874276-1386-1-git-send-email-rees@umich.edu> <20110729155136.GB28306@infradead.org> <20110729185415.GA23061@merit.edu> <20110729190133.GA10946@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20110729190133.GA10946@infradead.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:54:15PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > xfstests does require a small patch to work with NFSv4, which I can supply > if anyone is interested. Please send it to xfs@oss.sgi.com with a proper description and signoff. I don't have a proper patch, just one that works for me. But I'll send a bug report. It has to do with the mismatch between nfs and nfs4 mount types, so it's not really a xfstests bug. I think this will fix itself when the nfsvers=4 changes fully propagate. It seems like you didn't set up the SCRATCH_DEV variable properly. I was just skipping those tests so I could get to the one that fails. I've also tested with the SCRATCH_DEV tests in other runs. > Message from syslogd@rhcl1 at Jul 29 14:42:05 ... > kernel:------------[ cut here ]------------ > > Message from syslogd@rhcl1 at Jul 29 14:42:05 ... > kernel:invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP > > Message from syslogd@rhcl1 at Jul 29 14:42:05 ... > kernel:Stack: > > Message from syslogd@rhcl1 at Jul 29 14:42:05 ... > kernel:Call Trace: > > Message from syslogd@rhcl1 at Jul 29 14:42:05 ... Looks like we did find a bug in NFS. It kind of looks that way.