Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22148 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751223Ab1GYPS2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:18:28 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6PFISTU008170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:18:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2D8942.9020602@RedHat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:18:26 -0400 From: Steve Dickson To: Max Matveev CC: Linux NFS Mailing list , Ben England Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA: Increasing RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS References: <1311270542-2021-1-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com> <20009.12921.103429.724673@regina.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20009.12921.103429.724673@regina.usersys.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Sorry for the delayed response... I took a day off.. On 07/22/2011 04:19 AM, Max Matveev wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:49:02 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > steved> Our performance team has noticed that increasing > steved> RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS from 8 to 64 significantly > steved> increases throughput when using the RDMA transport. > > Did they try new client with old server and vice versa? > Both read and write? I believe it was done on the server side, but I've cc-ed the person who did the testing.... steved.