Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:22:49 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: block layout patches
Message-ID: <20110714172249.GA2362@infradead.org>
References: <20110714165004.GA2607@merit.edu>
 <20110714165348.GA13287@infradead.org>
 <20110714170924.GC2607@merit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20110714170924.GC2607@merit.edu>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:09:24PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
>   Err, what about actually posting them for review first?  The only thing
>   so far has been all that squashme mess.
> 
> Sorry for the missing context.  About a month ago I sent out an 88 patch set
> for pNFS Bakeathon.  That was a squashme mess.  Later I sent a 35 patch set,
> and got back a number of comments.  That's had a number of re-writes
> resulting in the current patch set, which is 28 patches.
> 
> While you're certainly welcome to review what's there now, it's mostly meant
> for Benny to pull into his tree to resolve any issues merging with other
> pNFS patches that haven't gone upstream yet.

Oh, okay.  for-trond sounds like an inclusion requests for the nfs tree.