Return-Path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:53228 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752616Ab1GaSYM (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:24:12 -0400 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:24:06 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please pull NFS client changes Message-ID: <20110731182406.GA16470@infradead.org> References: <1312082377.10882.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1312082377.10882.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 How does this manage to include the pnfs block code, which only was posted on the list a few hours before the pull request, and which doesn't appear to past testing very well (although the major issue seems to be core nfs code)?