Return-Path: Received: from natasha.panasas.com ([67.152.220.90]:54608 "EHLO natasha.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751435Ab1G1AMt (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:12:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4E30A957.7080804@panasas.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:12:07 -0700 From: Boaz Harrosh To: Jim Rees CC: Trond Myklebust , , peter honeyman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/25] NFS41: Let layoutcommit handle multiple segments References: <1311792048-12551-1-git-send-email-rees@umich.edu> <1311792048-12551-4-git-send-email-rees@umich.edu> <4E306F84.6030808@panasas.com> <1311798159.25645.32.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4E30762E.4000508@panasas.com> <20110727205804.GA13698@merit.edu> <4E307E6F.6090309@panasas.com> <20110727234041.GC14319@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110727234041.GC14319@merit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On 07/27/2011 04:40 PM, Jim Rees wrote: > Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > On 07/27/2011 01:58 PM, Jim Rees wrote: > > But I thought for simplicity since this patchset was reviewed then, I've > > tested with this patch and it works good as well. If you are going to > > break things up, I can test with the minimal patches and report what is > > need in Stable. (Is anyone working on it?) > > > > We may have over-squashed that one for block layout. I can dig up the > > original patches if necessary, but I'm guessing you probably have them. > > Please do. Because by now I'm confused. the first I discovered it was > by git diff of a branch that worked. I lost tracked of where the code > was originated from. > > Here is just the original multiple segments patch. This is from the > 88-patch set I sent out before Bakeathon. I don't know if this would still > apply separately. > OK Thanks that one looks familiar enough. I'll test just with this one. Where did the other changes come from? Is there a Benny's branch that have them separated so I can have a look. I suspect I also need the one that encodes the last_byte_written. Thanks Boaz > From fc3381fa66adfcee4203b5a55ca6605bcfc8dafb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Peng Tao > Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:42:56 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH 03/89] pnfs: let layoutcommit code handle multiple segments > > Some layout driver like block will have multiple segments. > Generic code should be able to handle it. > --- > fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c > index e3d618b..c18cda0 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c > @@ -1193,10 +1193,18 @@ pnfs_try_to_read_data(struct nfs_read_data *rdata, > static struct pnfs_layout_segment *pnfs_list_write_lseg(struct inode *inode) > { > struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, *rv = NULL; > + loff_t max_pos = 0; > + > + list_for_each_entry(lseg, &NFS_I(inode)->layout->plh_segs, pls_list) { > + if (lseg->pls_range.iomode == IOMODE_RW) { > + if (max_pos < lseg->pls_end_pos) > + max_pos = lseg->pls_end_pos; > + if (test_and_clear_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &lseg->pls_flags)) > + rv = lseg; > + } > + } > + rv->pls_end_pos = max_pos; > > - list_for_each_entry(lseg, &NFS_I(inode)->layout->plh_segs, pls_list) > - if (lseg->pls_range.iomode == IOMODE_RW) > - rv = lseg; > return rv; > } > > @@ -1211,6 +1219,7 @@ pnfs_set_layoutcommit(struct nfs_write_data *wdata) > if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) { > /* references matched in nfs4_layoutcommit_release */ > get_lseg(wdata->lseg); > + set_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &wdata->lseg->pls_flags); > wdata->lseg->pls_lc_cred = > get_rpccred(wdata->args.context->state->owner->so_cred); > mark_as_dirty = true; > diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h > index 53819d0..c6a9af2 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h > +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > enum { > NFS_LSEG_VALID = 0, /* cleared when lseg is recalled/returned */ > NFS_LSEG_ROC, /* roc bit received from server */ > + NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTCOMMIT, /* layoutcommit bit set for layoutcommit */ > }; > > struct pnfs_layout_segment {