Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56830 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752633Ab1HKBKg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:10:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110810175829.a834d80f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20110810122304.96b8be67.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110810175829.a834d80f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:10:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc1 (nfs/pnfs and drivers/md) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Peng Tao , Trond Myklebust , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > The blocklayout parts of NVS_V4_1 could depend on BLOCK. ?or all of NVS_V4_1 > can depend on BLOCK. Absolutely. Replace "could" by "should". There's no way I'll take a patch to make NFS "select BLOCK". If the block layer isn't enabled, then NFS obviously shouldn't be doing any pnfs stuff. Linus