Return-Path: Received: from frankvm.xs4all.nl ([83.163.148.79]:44997 "EHLO janus.localdomain" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869Ab1HWOTL (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:19:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:19:09 +0200 From: Frank van Maarseveen To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , jlayton@redhat.com Subject: Re: [NLM] support for a per-mount grace period. Message-ID: <20110823141909.GA2861@janus> References: <1311878660-24482-1-git-send-email-frankvm@frankvm.com> <20110729171126.GN23194@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20110729171126.GN23194@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 01:11:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 08:44:18PM +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > The following two patches implement support for a per-mount NLM > > grace period. The first patch is a minor cleanup which pushes > > down locks_in_grace() calls into functions shared by NFS[234]. Two > > locks_in_grace() tests have been reordered to avoid duplicate calls at > > run-time (assuming gcc is smart enough). nlmsvc_grace_period is now a > > function instead of an unused variable. > > > > The second patch is the actual implementation. It is currently in use for > > a number of NFSv3 virtual servers on one physical machine running 2.6.39.3 > > where the virtualization is based on using different IPv4 addresses. > > Thanks, that is something we'd like to have working well. Are the patches queued anywhere for inclusion in mainline? -- Frank