Return-Path: Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:32040 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754766Ab1HSNpW (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:45:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v3 0/75] enable SKB paged fragment lifetime visibility From: Ian Campbell To: David Miller CC: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20110819.063410.475175569086272526.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1313760393.5010.356.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110819.062958.1560313540665582388.davem@davemloft.net> <20110819.063410.475175569086272526.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:45:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1313761520.5010.363.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 14:34 +0100, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:29:58 -0700 (PDT) > > > From: Ian Campbell > > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:26:33 +0100 > > > >> This is v3 of my series to enable visibility into SKB paged fragment's > > > > Please tone down the patch count :-/ I'm not going to review anything more > > than ~20 or so patches at a time from any one person. Unfortunately I didn't see any middle ground between one massive patch munging drivers with lots of different maintainers and one patch per maintainer (which is loads). I'll resend in batches of ~20. After the first patch all the "convert to SKB paged frag API" patches are independent. Would you be willing to just review patches 1-20 of this series? In which case I could avoid spamming the list with those again now. > Also none of your patches will even apply to net-next GIT since nearly > all the ethernet drivers have been moved under drivers/net/ethernet Yes, I noted that in my intro mail and will rebase for v4. Since it's mostly just been code motion I think review in the old place will still be largely valid. Ian.