Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:35973 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752920Ab1H0AqV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:46:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:46:18 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , NFS list Subject: Re: [RFC] nfsd4: This is: "fix failure to end nfsd4 grace period" ++ Message-ID: <20110827004618.GG18699@fieldses.org> References: <4E45C594.1030609@panasas.com> <20110826201910.GB17196@fieldses.org> <4E5838E0.4090703@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4E5838E0.4090703@panasas.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:22:56PM -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > Which of the variables has the directory path? > Would we like to add that information in the print. From my experience > alot of times those type of problems is the mis-communication of > the path names, and it helps to see what name was actually attempted. Yeah, I wanted to then realized I'd have to muck about with some other stuff to get access to the directory name. Curse these patch reviewers, catching me being lazy. --b.