Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52241 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933643Ab1IIMig (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:38:36 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1315243548-18664-23-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1315243548-18664-23-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1315243548-18664-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, agruen@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -V6 22/26] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:37:45 +0100 Message-ID: <24985.1315571865@redhat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Cache richacls in struct inode so that this doesn't have to be done > individually in each filesystem. Since many ACLs in a filesystem are going to be identical, can you have a global hash table and share them? David