Return-Path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:35048 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751206Ab1I0BSc (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:18:32 -0400 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so4152905eya.19 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:18:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1317085155.21770.17.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <1316747758.3346.89.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <20110922134510.24683.14576.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1316707443.3346.44.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1316709935.3346.48.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <20110922133529.6d3ea8de@barsoom.rdu.redhat.com> <20110922144453.6cf53a25@barsoom.rdu.redhat.com> <1316719228.3968.14.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <2E1EB2CF9ED1CB4AA966F0EB76EAB4430B480BD4@SACMVEXC2-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <21772.1316774025@redhat.com> <1316788444.14812.10.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <29743.1316791138@redhat.com> <87hb43tf2g.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu> <1316827854.3346.154.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <20110924073610.4b045189@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <1317013864.3187.81.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1317071626.19951.8.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1317072718.19951.13.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1317076424.19951.32.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1317078563.21770.8.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1317085155.21770.17.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:18:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Suppress automount on [l]stat, [l]getxattr, etc. To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Ian Kent , Jeff Layton , Miklos Szeredi , David Howells , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@suse.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, leonardo.lists@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > OK. Then how about something along the lines of the following patch > (compile tested only)? I would seriously suggest aiming for *minimal*. So if it already has any of LOOKUP_DIRECTORY, LOOKUP_OPEN, LOOKUP_CREATE or LOOKUP_PARENT, don't add LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT - because it's not adding anything. We *have* to automount on those flags anyway. They are not like LOOKUP_FOLLOW was, where the automount decision was just a random (bad) choice. >From a quick look, pretty much all of the cases you added LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT to were already implicit automount events. So I think the two remaining ones are quotactl Q_QUOTAON case, bind mount in do_looopback(), and the nfs_follow_remote_path() case. Sure, we could add it to the others as some kind of "documentation" thing, but I think that should be separate and is debatable to begin with. Linus