Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:41968 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755014Ab1JaObm (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:31:42 -0400 Received: by vcge1 with SMTP id e1so4805639vcg.19 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:31:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2E1EB2CF9ED1CB4AA966F0EB76EAB4430BDE7515@SACMVEXC2-PRD.hq.netapp.com> References: <1319426747-2179-1-git-send-email-bergwolf@gmail.com> <4EAE9B60.9040903@tonian.com> <2E1EB2CF9ED1CB4AA966F0EB76EAB4430BDE7515@SACMVEXC2-PRD.hq.netapp.com> From: Peng Tao Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:31:20 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC] nfs41: handle BLK_LAYOUT CB_RECALL_ANY To: "Myklebust, Trond" Cc: Benny Halevy , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Peng Tao Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Trond, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Benny Halevy [mailto:bhalevy@tonian.com] >> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 8:58 AM >> To: Peng Tao >> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Myklebust, Trond; Peng Tao >> Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC] nfs41: handle BLK_LAYOUT CB_RECALL_ANY >> >> On 2011-10-24 05:25, Peng Tao wrote: >> > Hi, Trond and Benny, >> > >> > The patch depends on the pnfs private workqueue for now. So I want > to >> > consult you about where to put the work. Is pnfs private workqueue >> > dropped? If yes, where should I put this kind of work? >> >> I'll defer this to Trond. >> I'm OK with having a workqueue for pnfs. > > I've already commented on this: I see no justification whatsoever for a > private pnfs workqueue. OK. Thanks a lot for confirming it. I think I can just change this one to use the system wq. Will send an updated patch. -- Thanks, Tao