Return-Path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:43894 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751758Ab1JBHPk (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2011 03:15:40 -0400 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so4481093wwf.1 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 00:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E880F97.40405@tonian.com> Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 09:15:35 +0200 From: Benny Halevy To: Jim Rees CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, peter honeyman Subject: Re: Block layout status References: <20110929165253.GC3724@umich.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110929165253.GC3724@umich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On 2011-09-29 19:52, Jim Rees wrote: > Since the call doesn't seem to be happening, here's my status. > > On 16 Sep I sent these bug fixes to Trond for 3.1: > > Jim Rees (2): > pnfsblock: fix size of upcall message > pnfsblock: fix return code confusion > Peng Tao (3): > pnfsblock: fix NULL pointer dereference > pnfsblock: fix writeback deadlock > pnfsblock: add missing rpc_put_mount and path_put > > These are the ones I think are important enough, and low enough risk to > anyone else, that they should be considered for 3.1 even though it's late in > the release cycle. They have not shown up upstream. Trond? > > On 22 Sep I sent these to Trond for 3.2. I believe these are all in Benny's > tree now (sorry about that, Benny): > > Jim Rees (2): > pnfsblock: fix return code confusion > pnfsblock: fix size of upcall message > Peng Tao (8): > SUNRPC/NFS: make rpc pipe upcall generic > pnfsblock: add missing rpc_put_mount and path_put > pnfs: make _set_lo_fail generic > - pnfsblock: init pg_bsize properly > pnfs: recoalesce when ld write pagelist fails > pnfs: recoalesce when ld read pagelist fails > pnfsblock: fix NULL pointer dereference > pnfsblock: fix writeback deadlock > > This includes all the bug fixes for 3.1 plus some others that are less > important or higher risk. Notice that "init pg_bsize properly" is wrong and > should not be used. Benny, you may want to remove this from your tree, or I > can send a revert patch. No need. I'll just remove it from my tree. > > Missing from these is one more, "nfs4: serialize layoutcommit" that's > important but I somehow missed it. > > The recent automount changes really screwed us up but I just built a kernel > from Linus's latest, which includes the patches from Trond, and it passes > all tests so I think we're still ok for 3.1. Great. I'll rebase and release accordingly. Benny > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html