Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:56266 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754221Ab1KHEdi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:33:38 -0500 Received: by ggnb2 with SMTP id b2so121024ggn.19 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:33:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1617B125-3EFF-42EB-8F1B-A1D57E6ADC12@oracle.com> References: <1617B125-3EFF-42EB-8F1B-A1D57E6ADC12@oracle.com> From: Hamo Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:33:17 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mount.nfs: ensure AF priority when mounting To: Chuck Lever Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, steved@redhat.com, jlayton@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Hamo wrote: > >> On different architectures, getaddrinfo() may return different >> orders of address families. This may confuse the users. >> This patch fixes this problem by ensuring that we first try >> through IPv6(if present), then through IPv4. >> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750729 > > By the way, this bug isn't public (I can't access it, anyway). ?If RH can't make it public, perhaps a copy of the relevant parts of the bug can be created in bugzilla.linux-nfs.org? ?Otherwise, it's hard to tell what you are trying to fix so we can do a thorough patch review. > > (Also, I'm not sure why you copied lkml and linux-fsdevel on this NFS-specific user space patch). > Hi Chuck, added you in the CC list so that you can view this bug. I miss-added those two mailing lists, thanks for pointing out this. Thanks, Yang