Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from nm20.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.77]:20764 "HELO nm20.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753492Ab1KEDvv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 23:51:51 -0400 References: <1320349396.90614.YahooMailNeo@web24707.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1320353685.18396.119.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20111103211100.GA8393@umich.edu> <1320356241.80563.YahooMailNeo@web24706.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <92DF2E31-FABF-40A5-8F78-89B64363568B@oracle.com> <1320361764.48851.YahooMailNeo@web24708.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <39983D1A-70A8-49A1-A4E2-926637780F75@oracle.com> <1320399858.11675.YahooMailNeo@web24703.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <06799B7D-54CD-41D8-934A-F9C78B23677C@oracle.com> <1320450001.87605.YahooMailNeo@web24706.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1320455965.2750.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1320459252.59518.YahooMailNeo@web24716.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1320460311.2750.21.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Message-ID: <1320465106.61111.YahooMailNeo@web24710.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 03:51:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Lukas Razik Reply-To: Lukas Razik Subject: Re: [BUG?] Maybe NFS bug since 2.6.37 on SPARC64 To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Chuck Lever , Jim Rees , Linux NFS Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1320460311.2750.21.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> ***IMPORTANT HINT*** >> >> In the test belowI've tried to ping the NFS client (cluster2) as soon > as I've got the >> >> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready >> message. >> >> >> And at first I've got no answers from the client. But 10-20sec later > I've got pongs back. >> So the NIC comes up some seconds later than the message "link becomes > ready" is shown... >> In the case of 'mountproto=tcp' it comes up after the kernel panic. > So that's much too late. >> > > So, once again... > > What kind of switch is this client connected to, and how is that switch > configured? I can't answer this question because I have no physical access to the hardware. Hence I think it's logical to stop here until the nodes are connected directly (without any hardware between them). I'll write here as soon as I know if it works... For the rest I thank all contributors for the fast help! Regards, Lukas