Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6649 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753427Ab1KJVZn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:25:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4EBC4153.9090003@RedHat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:25:39 -0500 From: Steve Dickson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Rees CC: Linux NFS Mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsidmap: Added -v flag References: <1320956785-18004-1-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com> <1320956785-18004-3-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com> <20111110211117.GA2011@umich.edu> In-Reply-To: <20111110211117.GA2011@umich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/10/2011 04:11 PM, Jim Rees wrote: > Steve Dickson wrote: > > To aid in debugging, the -v flag can now be specified > on the command to enable verbose logging in both > the nfsidmap command and libnfsidmap library routines. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson > --- > utils/nfsidmap/nfsidmap.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > utils/nfsidmap/nfsidmap.man | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/utils/nfsidmap/nfsidmap.c b/utils/nfsidmap/nfsidmap.c > index 134d9bc..d74189a 100644 > --- a/utils/nfsidmap/nfsidmap.c > +++ b/utils/nfsidmap/nfsidmap.c > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #include > #include "xlog.h" > > +int verbose = 0; > /* gcc nfsidmap.c -o nfsidmap -l nfsidmap -l keyutils */ > > #define MAX_ID_LEN 11 > @@ -108,6 +109,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > xlog_syslog(1); > xlog_stderr(0); > > + if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-v") == 0) { > + verbose = 1; > + nfs4_set_debug(1, NULL); > + argc--, argv++; > + } > + > > Ugh. Is there some reason not to use getopt() like all the other utils do? I was waiting for this comment ;-) I decided to go with how the command was originally written because this command is only call from the kernel so a user should execute it (except for debugging). The arguments are vary static on where they need to be no command line. So its either going to work or not, which means there is no real need for a usage error (expect for the one I added). Finally, is there real need for a while loop and switch statement for on simple case? I thought not... Those are my thoughts.. steved.