Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from natasha.panasas.com ([67.152.220.90]:50729 "EHLO natasha.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756571Ab1K2Xr7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:47:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4ED56F22.70106@panasas.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:47:46 -0800 From: Boaz Harrosh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trond Myklebust CC: Peng Tao , , , Garth Gibson , Matt Benjamin , Marc Eshel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] nfs41: allow layoutget at pnfs_do_multiple_writes References: <1322887965-2938-1-git-send-email-bergwolf@gmail.com> <4ED54FE4.9050008@panasas.com> <4ED55399.4060707@panasas.com> <1322603848.11286.7.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4ED55F78.205@panasas.com> <1322607704.11286.38.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> In-Reply-To: <1322607704.11286.38.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/29/2011 03:01 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 14:40 -0800, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> The reason Netapp don't see a point is not a factor. I have not seen a netapp >> server doing a top 100 HPC cluster either. > > BTW: Stop adding this "NetApp" insinuation bullshit... > > I _strongly_ resent the fact that you appear to think I'm incapable of > thinking for myself... > OK I take that back, and apologize. Please for give me. No insult intended. I got emotional and feared that fireworks we tend to have about the all thing. I should have exercised more Control. If any thing it is the opposite, I think you are a brilliant guy, and I admire your thinking, hence my big dilemma. Heart