Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:36048 "EHLO test.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933025Ab2AKPb3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:31:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:31:25 -0500 From: "Ted Ts'o" To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Bernd Schubert , ext4 development , linux-fsdevel Devel , Fan Yong , "J. Bruce Fields" , Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] [RESEND] 32/64 bit llseek hashes (v5) Message-ID: <20120111153125.GC4589@thunk.org> References: <20120109132137.2616029.76288.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120111144827.GA32381@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20120111144827.GA32381@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:48:27AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Yes, this needs to be fixed--is there anything in particular holding up > these patches? Yes, I need more people reviewing ext4 patches, so it's not me doing all of the review. :-) I will put this on my "high priority to review ASAP for the next merge window" list. - Ted