Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from natasha.panasas.com ([67.152.220.90]:60944 "EHLO natasha.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752424Ab2AIMt6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:49:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4F0AE25C.5020706@panasas.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:49:32 +0200 From: Boaz Harrosh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benny Halevy CC: , , NFS list , "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] linux-pnfs server implementations References: <4EF6A6CA.1020606@tonian.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF6A6CA.1020606@tonian.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/25/2011 06:30 AM, Benny Halevy wrote: > Now that the client side of pnfs is in the mainline kernel > I believe it is time to consider the inclusion of the server side. > > I propose the following agenda for discussion > (order may change with no advance notice :) > > * What's currently available in git://linux-nfs.org/~halevy/linux-pnfs.git > - What are the sub-projects > - How they relate to each other > > * High-level design of the implementation > > * Summary of generic changes in nfsd > > * For each of the different sub-projects, briefly present: > - What does it do > - Benefits and Potential > - Limitations > - Status > - To-do > > * Prerequisites for inclusion > > * Discussion > Me too! This subject is close to my heart, as exofs is the most complete and advanced pNFSD base implementation. Last testing has demonstrated amazing performance and scalability. Saturating 10G from a single client and saturating 4*10G storage cluster from multiple clients.(Though there were problems with too many clients) > Benny Thanks Boaz