Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from smtp.mail.umich.edu ([141.211.12.86]:51969 "EHLO tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753842Ab2BPULB (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:11:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:10:56 -0500 From: Jim Rees To: "Adamson, Dros" Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" , "" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFSv4: Send implementation id with exchange_id Message-ID: <20120216201056.GA29946@umich.edu> References: <1329409026-20466-1-git-send-email-dros@netapp.com> <20120216173022.GA29158@umich.edu> <6174C8A1-D1C7-4D26-97A1-1D983FA1D5F4@netapp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <6174C8A1-D1C7-4D26-97A1-1D983FA1D5F4@netapp.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Adamson, Dros wrote: >> General comment... If this is going to be configurable, I'd rather make it a >> sysctl, and be able to set the id to whatever I want at run time. But >> that's because I like to be able to break things. I suspect Trond will >> disagree. > > Hrm my ispell pass missed this. … I'll wait for additional comments before reposting. I guess my point was, why make it configurable at all?