Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de ([131.246.120.220]:39224 "EHLO mailgw1.uni-kl.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756561Ab2CEMXp (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 07:23:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4F54B049.5000705@itwm.fraunhofer.de> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:23:37 +0100 From: Bernd Schubert MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ted Ts'o" CC: "J. Bruce Fields" , Andreas Dilger , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ext4 development , linux-fsdevel Devel , Fan Yong , "J. Bruce Fields" , Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] [RESEND] 32/64 bit llseek hashes (v5) References: <20120109132137.2616029.76288.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120111144827.GA32381@fieldses.org> <20120111153125.GC4589@thunk.org> In-Reply-To: <20120111153125.GC4589@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/11/2012 04:31 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:48:27AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> >> Yes, this needs to be fixed--is there anything in particular holding up >> these patches? > > Yes, I need more people reviewing ext4 patches, so it's not me doing > all of the review. :-) > > I will put this on my "high priority to review ASAP for the next merge > window" list. Ted, did you have a chance to review the patches in the mean time? I will go on vacation on Wednesday for two weeks in Moscow and I'm not sure yet if I will have internet access there. So if I need to update the patches for linux-3.4, tomorrow is probably the last day me to do that. Thanks, Bernd