Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:48292 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752690Ab2CBSD5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:03:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:03:55 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: steve Cc: Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: POSIX acls over nfs4 Message-ID: <20120302180355.GA25925@fieldses.org> References: <20120228200524.GE2723@fieldses.org> <4F4D61B6.5090304@steve-ss.com> <20120229124401.GA9160@fieldses.org> <4F4E306C.6030400@steve-ss.com> <20120229140903.GA3007@fieldses.org> <4F4E3599.2050209@steve-ss.com> <20120229143236.GB3007@fieldses.org> <4F4E38E7.6060308@steve-ss.com> <20120301205639.GC17433@fieldses.org> <4F4FF40C.4050905@steve-ss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4F4FF40C.4050905@steve-ss.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:11:24PM +0100, steve wrote: > 1. Do we need to remove /etc/idmapd.conf for nfs3? No. > 2. Could I take this opportunity to ask as a feature request that > nfs4_setfacl be able to offer group rw from a 0022 umask? I agree that this needs to be fixed, but personally it's not likely to make it to the top of my todo list very soon. --b.