Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from partagas.dragonet.es ([217.70.240.130]:32799 "EHLO partagas.dragonet.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752073Ab2DUM3s (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:29:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4F929B50.1020407@steve-ss.com> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:34:40 +0200 From: steve MIME-Version: 1.0 To: simo CC: "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeremy Allison , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, "samba-technical@lists.samba.org" , Ondrej Valousek Subject: Re: NFSv4 ACLs References: <4F913492.8000402@s3group.cz> <20120420185553.GB32622@samba2> <20120420212627.GA710@fieldses.org> <20120420215945.GE32622@samba2> <20120420220832.GA1914@fieldses.org> <1334972084.2492.722.camel@pico.li.ssimo.org> In-Reply-To: <1334972084.2492.722.camel@pico.li.ssimo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21/04/12 03:34, simo wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 18:08 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:59:45PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:26:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:55:53AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:04:02PM +0200, Ondrej Valousek wrote: >>>>>> Hi List, >>>>>> > >> (By the way, is reexporting nfs with samba really going to work well >> anyway?) > > Not really, it is generally unsupported, except for read only shares. It > will work in most of the simple cases for writing .. until it breaks :) > Hi That's worrying. We been rw'ing nfs/samba for years. Maybe we're the only ones. nfs3 for our Linux clients and samba for the rest. Same shared data. Only Posix acl's though. Maybe that's the simple bit? Cheers, Steve