Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55196 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753619Ab2DPNo3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:44:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:44:22 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Fred Isaman Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , Linux-Netdev , Linux-NFS , LKML , David Miller , Trond Myklebust , Neil Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Peter Zijlstra , Mike Christie , Eric B Munson Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] nfs: disable data cache revalidation for swapfiles Message-ID: <20120416134422.GC2359@suse.de> References: <1334578675-23445-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1334578675-23445-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:10:04AM -0400, Fred Isaman wrote: > > > > -static struct nfs_page *nfs_page_find_request_locked(struct page *page) > > +static struct nfs_page * > > +nfs_page_find_request_locked(struct nfs_inode *nfsi, struct page *page) > > ?{ > > ? ? ? ?struct nfs_page *req = NULL; > > > > - ? ? ? if (PagePrivate(page)) { > > + ? ? ? if (PagePrivate(page)) > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?req = (struct nfs_page *)page_private(page); > > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (req != NULL) > > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? kref_get(&req->wb_kref); > > + ? ? ? else if (unlikely(PageSwapCache(page))) { > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct nfs_page *freq, *t; > > + > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Linearly search the commit list for the correct req */ > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? list_for_each_entry_safe(freq, t, &nfsi->commit_list, wb_list) { > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (freq->wb_page == page) { > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? req = freq; > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } > > + > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? BUG_ON(req == NULL); > > I suspect I am missing something, but why is it guaranteed that the > req is on the commit list? > It's a fair question and a statement about what I expected to happen. The commit list replaces the nfs_page_tree radix tree that used to exist and my understanding was that the req would exist in the radix tree until the swap IO was completed. I expected it to be the same for the commit list and the BUG_ON was based on that expectation. Are there cases where the req would not be found? Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs