Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]:60401 "EHLO idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753272Ab2DSXdC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:33:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Andreas Dilger In-Reply-To: <20120419140612.17272.57774.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:36:32 -0600 Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, kfm-devel@kde.org, nautilus-list@gnome.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Message-Id: <5D4BF4AB-47E9-4E25-B2A3-F895C98BDAA3@dilger.ca> References: <20120419140558.17272.74360.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20120419140612.17272.57774.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: David Howells Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2012-04-19, at 8:06 AM, David Howells wrote: > Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available, > including file creation time, inode version and data version where available through the underlying filesystem. > > The idea was initially proposed as a set of xattrs that could be > retrieved with getxattr(), but the general preferance proved to be > for new syscalls with an extended stat structure. I would comment that it was the opposite. It was originally a stat()-like extension that degraded into a messy getxattr() mess. > (2) Lightweight stat: Ask for just those details of interest, and > allow a netfs (such as NFS) to approximate anything not of > interest, possibly without going to the server [Trond Myklebust, > Ulrich Drepper]. This was my original motivation for this functionality, so you can put my name here also. > The fields in struct xstat come in a number of classes: > > (0) st_dev, st_blksize, st_information. > > These are local data and are always available. For the extra two bits it would cost us, I don't think st_blksize and st_information should always be returned. st_blksize may be variable for a distributed filesystem, and some of the fields in st_information (offline) may not be free to access either. Cheers, Andreas