Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from spam.physics.umanitoba.ca ([130.179.72.17]:50844 "EHLO hauhet.physics.umanitoba.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755520Ab2GXRD4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:03:56 -0400 Received: from [130.179.72.253] (shodan.physics.umanitoba.ca [130.179.72.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hauhet.physics.umanitoba.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FE465946 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:03:56 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <500ED5E4.1050902@physics.umanitoba.ca> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:05:40 -0500 From: Maiko Langelaar MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2 NFS server for the same mount point ? References: <500EBB69.5000205@physics.umanitoba.ca> <20120724155304.GA9721@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20120724155304.GA9721@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Yes, you can. Just to be on the safe side, I should be a bit more clear on this. Both of the NFS servers will be running simultaneously, both exporting the same mount points for the same subnet. Maiko