Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:29681 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754767Ab2HGOgu (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:36:50 -0400 Message-ID: <502127EF.3030209@netapp.com> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:36:31 -0400 From: Bryan Schumaker MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Roedel CC: Joerg Roedel , Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wdauchy@gmail.com Subject: Re: kernel BUG at /data/lemmy/linux.trees.git/fs/nfs/idmap.c:681! References: <20120807134156.GP1996@amd.com> <50211E42.6040808@netapp.com> <20120807141548.GG1917@8bytes.org> <5021237D.1010107@netapp.com> <20120807142707.GH1917@8bytes.org> In-Reply-To: <20120807142707.GH1917@8bytes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/07/2012 10:27 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:17:33AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote: >> On 08/07/2012 10:15 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >>> Yes, it reproduces pretty reliable here with Ubuntu 11.10 Server on an >>> Intel box with an NFSv3 directory mounted at boot. This is the only box >>> I have seen this so far, probably it depends on the config. I attach the >>> config of the failing box. >> >> Interesting. Are you mounting v4, too? This code shouldn't be >> running for v3... maybe that's why I haven't been able to hit it. > > No, I am not using NFSv4 on the box where the BUG happens. I have > another box mounting the same directory where the BUG does not trigger > with v3.6-rc1. A difference I spotted between the kernels is, that on > the failing box NFS is compiled as a module whereas it is compiled into > the kernel on the box that works fine. Not sure if that has anything to > do with the problem... > Your stack trace is showing v4 calls on the failing box, those definitely shouldn't be happening if you're using v3. Can you double check /etc/fstab and /proc/mounts on a working kernel to be sure? My VM has nfs as a module, so I don't think that's the issue... I just started compiling your config to test on my own. > > Joerg > >