Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from minas.ics.muni.cz ([147.251.4.40]:49859 "EHLO minas.ics.muni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755366Ab2HIIG5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 04:06:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:06:42 +0200 From: Zdenek Salvet To: "Myklebust, Trond" Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Lukas Hejtmanek , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: NFSv4 backchannel authentication Message-ID: <20120809080642.GE604@horn.ics.muni.cz> Reply-To: salvet@ics.muni.cz References: <20120806135517.GS25979@ics.muni.cz> <20120807154114.GA21460@fieldses.org> <1344355148.5781.31.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20120808075813.GW604@horn.ics.muni.cz> <1344431887.3423.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1344431887.3423.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:18:09PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > > We don't see any hard failures because NFS protocol does > > not depend on working callback RPCs, but no delegations are granted > > (we had nfs-kernel-server package installed on clients before which masked > > the bug). > > So your gripe that you object to us requiring you to run rpc.svcgssd in > order to obtain server features such as NFSv4 callbacks? Absolutely not! Just thinking why we did not notice the problem earlier ... -- Zdenek Salvet salvet@ics.muni.cz Institute of Computer Science of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic and CESNET, z.s.p.o., Prague, Czech Republic Phone: ++420-549 49 6534 Fax: ++420-541 212 747 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Teamwork is essential -- it allows you to blame someone else.