Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail.openrapids.net ([64.15.138.104]:58361 "EHLO blackscsi.openrapids.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757311Ab2J2MUz (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:20:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:20:52 -0400 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Sasha Levin Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com, aarcange@redhat.com, ericvh@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, ccaulfie@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, bfields@fieldses.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com, venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, ejt@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, lw@cn.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/16] block,elevator: use new hashtable implementation Message-ID: <20121029122052.GB11733@Krystal> References: <1351450948-15618-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1351450948-15618-8-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1351450948-15618-8-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Sasha Levin (levinsasha928@gmail.com) wrote: [...] > @@ -96,6 +97,8 @@ struct elevator_type > struct list_head list; > }; > > +#define ELV_HASH_BITS 6 > + > /* > * each queue has an elevator_queue associated with it > */ > @@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ struct elevator_queue > void *elevator_data; > struct kobject kobj; > struct mutex sysfs_lock; > - struct hlist_head *hash; > + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hash, ELV_HASH_BITS); > unsigned int registered:1; Hrm, so this is moving "registered" out of the elevator_queue first cache-line by turning the pointer into a 256 or 512 bytes hash table. Maybe we should consider moving "registered" before the "hash" field ? Thanks, Mathieu > }; > > -- > 1.7.12.4 > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com