Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from natasha.panasas.com ([67.152.220.90]:53760 "EHLO natasha.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754652Ab2JISpG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:45:06 -0400 Message-ID: <507470AB.8030900@panasas.com> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 11:44:59 -0700 From: Boaz Harrosh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peng Tao CC: Trond Myklebust , linuxnfs Subject: Re: [PATCH-Resend] NFS41: layoutget optimize and pnfsblock cleanup References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/07/2012 02:59 PM, Peng Tao wrote: > Hi Trond, > > Following first three patches were sent before and optimize layoutget size. > Last patch is cleanup and is also sent before. > > Sorry that I have to send patches as attachments. I am having problem > with my smtp setup. > > Thanks, > Tao > Tao hi. What are these patches based on? they do not apply to Linus tree as of today (v3.6-9228-g547b1e8) and they do not apply to v3.6 nor v3.5 tags. I get a conflict on the first patch: NFS: track direct IO left bytes (Do you have a public git tree with these on? Why don't you ask for a git tree on git.linux-nfs.org. Trond who should we ask for an hosting on git.linux-nfs.org) Thanks Boaz > Peng Tao (4): > NFS: track direct IO left bytes > NFS41: send real write size in layoutget > NFS41: send real read size in layoutget > pnfsblock: cleanup nfs4_blkdev_get > > fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.h | 1 - > fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c | 25 ++++------------------ > fs/nfs/direct.c | 12 +++++++++++ > fs/nfs/internal.h | 1 + > fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 9 +++++++- > fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 16 ++++++++++++-- > fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 3 +- > 8 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >