Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:65072 "EHLO mail-la0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755657Ab2JJKON (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:14:13 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h6so241106lag.19 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:14:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <507474F5.8050307@panasas.com> References: <507470AB.8030900@panasas.com> <507474F5.8050307@panasas.com> From: Peng Tao Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:13:50 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH-Resend] NFS41: layoutget optimize and pnfsblock cleanup To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Trond Myklebust , linuxnfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 10/09/2012 11:44 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 10/07/2012 02:59 PM, Peng Tao wrote: >>> Hi Trond, >>> >>> Following first three patches were sent before and optimize layoutget size. >>> Last patch is cleanup and is also sent before. >>> >>> Sorry that I have to send patches as attachments. I am having problem >>> with my smtp setup. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tao >>> >> >> Tao hi. >> >> What are these patches based on? they do not apply to Linus tree as of today >> (v3.6-9228-g547b1e8) and they do not apply to v3.6 nor v3.5 tags. >> >> I get a conflict on the first patch: >> NFS: track direct IO left bytes >> > > Actually the second patch does not apply either. minor on pnfs.c but > a real fallout on blocklayout.c (3 and 4 are fine) > Sorry I forgot to mention... They apply to Trond's nfs-for-next branch, commit (5f65753033d8c5a53e65810bff3832e8282c68d1). Thanks, Tao