Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:56532 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751384Ab2K2UUn (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:20:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:20:38 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Stef Bon Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" , simo , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , linux-cifs Subject: Re: Possible to make nfs aware of a inotify watch has been set. Message-ID: <20121129202037.GQ4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA90B329CFD@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <1354202525.4064.1.camel@pico.ipa.ssimo.org> <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA90B32AEB7@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:39:27PM +0100, Stef Bon wrote: > And yes there is no such thing as a killer app, but in my opinion it's > the user experience. Ah, yes... UX - the killer argument. "Doing that would make qi flow better" and any objections are waved away, since the person objecting has no idea how qi behaves (since it doesn't exist, to start with). Could we please keep the intellectual level above the Feng Shui scammers^W^W^WUX theorists usual?