Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:62151 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753893Ab2KZP6s (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:58:48 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p5so3776095dak.19 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:58:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50B3918E.4020303@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:28:06 +0530 From: "dE ." MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Slow NFS loop performance. References: <50AF57A3.3090000@gmail.com> <20121123172333.GB8776@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20121123172333.GB8776@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/23/12 22:53, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:31:55PM +0530, dE . wrote: >> Humm... The last thing I expected was no response even in the mailing list. >> >> So I'm filing a bug on this. >> >> On Oct 23, 2012 2:19 PM, "dE ." wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Great job with NFS server, it surely is fast, but not on loop devices. >>> >>> If I loop mount a file and share the mount point over NFS3 or NFS4, the >>> write performance of the client on the loop mounted share is pretty bad. >>> >>> On a 100 Mbps (or 12.5MBps) full duplex Ethernet link, I get ~8MBps >>> speeds, whereas on the loop mounted device, I get at best 6MBps. > What exactly is your test? > > --b. Sorry for the late response. I'd 200+ unread mails. I'm writing a large file to the mounted loop device.