Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ia0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:43243 "EHLO mail-ia0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753639Ab2KHDDX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:03:23 -0500 Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y32so1619044iag.19 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:03:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121107190111.GC7421@fieldses.org> References: <1351760297.5369.1.camel@localhost> <20121107190111.GC7421@fieldses.org> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:03:22 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hang problem when umount a nfs point From: Jack Wang To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn_Cigorraga?= , dahai_tian@usish.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2012/11/8 J. Bruce Fields : > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:05:51AM +0800, Jack Wang wrote: >> 2012/11/7 Martín Cigorraga : >> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Jack Wang >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Anyone who can kindly give some suggestion? or we just put question to >> >> the wrong list? >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Jack >> >> >> >> 2012/11/1 dahai_tian : >> >> > Hi all: >> >> > I mount a local directory to a nfs server. When nfs server is >> >> > stopped >> >> > for some accidental cause, I try to umount the mount point, the umount >> >> > command will hang and 'time out' messages are continually printed in the >> >> > terminal. How can I avoid hanging in this case? BTW, This issue does not >> >> > exist when I changed nfs version from 4 to 3. >> >> > Look forward to your response, thanks! >> >> > >> > Hi Jack, use the -l (lazy) switch: >> > # umount -l {your mounted nfs share} >> > >> > Also, I wouldn't recommend 'just to kill' the NFS proces(ses) as it (them) >> > may leave shared memory a mess. >> > (And I would like to see how do you make to mount any NFS share again >> > without booting) >> >> Thanks Martin for kindly help. >> >> umount -l did work, but why nfsv3 do not have this problem? > > I don't know what it is exactly. But in general I wouldn't expect > umount to work when the server's unavailable. > > --b. Thanks for your time Bruce, but there are chance the server unavailable , why you think umount don't work is expected? Jack