Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from tirith.ics.muni.cz ([147.251.4.36]:47157 "EHLO tirith.ics.muni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755698Ab2LMO4Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:56:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:56:21 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek To: Fred Isaman Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: local_lock mount option Message-ID: <20121213145621.GB1045@ics.muni.cz> References: <20121213133554.GO10897@ics.muni.cz> <20121213142336.GP10897@ics.muni.cz> <20121213144025.GA1045@ics.muni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:48:25AM -0500, Fred Isaman wrote: > The idea is that delegations are a better way to decide whether the > client should cache locks. well, but I need to fake locks on client, i.e., client's lock always succeeds independently of NFS server. I know that's wrong approchach but until I got fix for NFS+CXFS, I dont' see any other option. And I believe that local_locks=any does exactly what I need. -- Luk?? Hejtm?nek