Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ve0-f178.google.com ([209.85.128.178]:43341 "EHLO mail-ve0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773Ab3BDT3t (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:29:49 -0500 Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id db10so5040188veb.23 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:29:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:29:44 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: bfields Cc: majianpeng , linux-nfs Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: Fix memleak. Message-ID: <20130204192905.GY27963@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <201301291315585633212@gmail.com> <20130129222926.GA6219@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130129222926.GA6219@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:29:26PM -0500, bfields wrote: > Tejun, maybe this could be added to your series? > > (Or should I just take it without the idr_remove_all()?) There are gonna be other related nfs changes anyway, so I think it would be better to just route it through the usual nfs channel. We can deal with conflicts / conversion later. Thanks. -- tejun