Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32736 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758188Ab3BNPUr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:20:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:20:38 -0500 From: Jeff Layton To: Tim Gardner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] lockd: nlmclnt_reclaim(): avoid stack overflow Message-ID: <20130214102038.52b1d292@tlielax.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <1360770016-69586-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com> References: <20130212211800.GG10267@fieldses.org> <1360770016-69586-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:40:16 -0700 Tim Gardner wrote: > Even though nlmclnt_reclaim() is only one call into the stack frame, > 928 bytes on the stack seems like a lot. Recode to dynamically > allocate the request structure once from within the reclaimer task, > then pass this pointer into nlmclnt_reclaim() for reuse on > subsequent calls. > > smatch analysis: > > fs/lockd/clntproc.c:620 nlmclnt_reclaim() warn: 'reqst' puts > 928 bytes on stack > > Also remove redundant assignment of 0 after memset. > > Cc: Trond Myklebust > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner > --- > > Changes from v1 -- don't return -ENOMEM from a task thread because it is > not propagated to the task creator. Instead print an error message and return. > > fs/lockd/clntlock.c | 12 +++++++++++- > fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 6 ++---- > include/linux/lockd/lockd.h | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/lockd/clntlock.c b/fs/lockd/clntlock.c > index 4885b53..6cd673d 100644 > --- a/fs/lockd/clntlock.c > +++ b/fs/lockd/clntlock.c > @@ -220,10 +220,19 @@ reclaimer(void *ptr) > { > struct nlm_host *host = (struct nlm_host *) ptr; > struct nlm_wait *block; > + struct nlm_rqst *req; > struct file_lock *fl, *next; > u32 nsmstate; > struct net *net = host->net; > > + req = kmalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!req) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "lockd: reclaimer unable to alloc memory." > + " Locks for %s won't be reclaimed!\n", > + host->h_name); > + return 0; > + } > + > allow_signal(SIGKILL); > > down_write(&host->h_rwsem); > @@ -253,7 +262,7 @@ restart: > */ > if (signalled()) > continue; > - if (nlmclnt_reclaim(host, fl) != 0) > + if (nlmclnt_reclaim(host, fl, req) != 0) > continue; > list_add_tail(&fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list, &host->h_granted); > if (host->h_nsmstate != nsmstate) { > @@ -279,5 +288,6 @@ restart: > /* Release host handle after use */ > nlmclnt_release_host(host); > lockd_down(net); > + kfree(req); > return 0; > } > diff --git a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c > index 54f9e6c..b43114c 100644 > --- a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c > +++ b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c > @@ -615,17 +615,15 @@ out_unlock: > * RECLAIM: Try to reclaim a lock > */ > int > -nlmclnt_reclaim(struct nlm_host *host, struct file_lock *fl) > +nlmclnt_reclaim(struct nlm_host *host, struct file_lock *fl, > + struct nlm_rqst *req) > { > - struct nlm_rqst reqst, *req; > int status; > > - req = &reqst; > memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req)); > locks_init_lock(&req->a_args.lock.fl); > locks_init_lock(&req->a_res.lock.fl); > req->a_host = host; > - req->a_flags = 0; > > /* Set up the argument struct */ > nlmclnt_setlockargs(req, fl); > diff --git a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h b/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h > index f5a051a..a395f1e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h > +++ b/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h > @@ -212,7 +212,8 @@ int nlmclnt_block(struct nlm_wait *block, struct nlm_rqst *req, long timeout) > __be32 nlmclnt_grant(const struct sockaddr *addr, > const struct nlm_lock *lock); > void nlmclnt_recovery(struct nlm_host *); > -int nlmclnt_reclaim(struct nlm_host *, struct file_lock *); > +int nlmclnt_reclaim(struct nlm_host *, struct file_lock *, > + struct nlm_rqst *); > void nlmclnt_next_cookie(struct nlm_cookie *); > > /* Oops, just noticed there was a later version of this patch. Please disregard my earlier mail... Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton