Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:42382 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757180Ab3BVWSi (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:18:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:18:35 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Al Viro Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: handle vfs_getattr errors in acl protocol Message-ID: <20130222221835.GC30856@fieldses.org> References: <20130201131537.GC30668@fieldses.org> <20130201185721.GP4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130201201304.GE30668@fieldses.org> <20130222214634.GB30856@fieldses.org> <20130222221506.GM4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130222221506.GM4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:15:06PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:46:34PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > Actually, we have precisely the same interface except for the name: > > > > > > __be32 fh_getattr(struct svc_fh *fh, struct kstat *stat) > > > vs. > > > __be32 nfsd_getattr(struct svc_fh *fh, struct kstat *stat) > > > > > > but I'm fine with your name. > > > > > > Do you want to take these patches, or should I? > > *blink* > > I blame being very low on caffeine; that, or being a blind idiot... > My apologies ;-/ > > > I guess what I'll do unless I hear otherwise is apply both your patch > > and mine to my tree for 3.9. > > FWIW, I'm going to push the first part of VFS queue later tonight... OK, I'll wait and see what's in that. (And what should I do with the delegation patches?) --b.