Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:41449 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753642Ab3BLXLU (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:11:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:11:13 -0500 To: Steve Dickson Cc: Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , "David P. Quigley" , Linux NFS list , Linux FS devel list , Linux Security List , SELinux List Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] lnfs: 3.8-rc6 release Message-ID: <20130212231113.GQ10267@fieldses.org> References: <1360327163-20360-1-git-send-email-SteveD@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1360327163-20360-1-git-send-email-SteveD@redhat.com> From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: So originally I thought Dave was saying we'd try to get the label change attribute in the initial submission. I guess it'll be coming later instead? This is going to be a part of NFSv4.2, so shouldn't this really come with patches to implement minor version 2? (Should be totally trivial as it doesn't have to do anything other than labeled NFS for now.) If not, that's another reason why we don't want to recommend building this by default. Though maybe advertising labeled NFS support in v4.1 won't cause a problem for any implementation in practice, I don't know. --b.