Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:60372 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757136Ab3BVWPI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:15:08 -0500
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:15:06 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: handle vfs_getattr errors in acl protocol
Message-ID: <20130222221506.GM4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20130201131537.GC30668@fieldses.org>
 <20130201185721.GP4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20130201201304.GE30668@fieldses.org>
 <20130222214634.GB30856@fieldses.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20130222214634.GB30856@fieldses.org>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:46:34PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:

> > Actually, we have precisely the same interface except for the name:
> > 
> > 	__be32 fh_getattr(struct svc_fh *fh, struct kstat *stat)
> > vs.
> > 	__be32 nfsd_getattr(struct svc_fh *fh, struct kstat *stat)
> > 
> > but I'm fine with your name.
> > 
> > Do you want to take these patches, or should I?

*blink*

I blame being very low on caffeine; that, or being a blind idiot...
My apologies ;-/

> I guess what I'll do unless I hear otherwise is apply both your patch
> and mine to my tree for 3.9.

FWIW, I'm going to push the first part of VFS queue later tonight...