Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14777 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760692Ab3D3Rcg (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:32:36 -0400 Message-ID: <5180002D.4070002@RedHat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:32:29 -0400 From: Steve Dickson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Myklebust, Trond" CC: "J. Bruce Fields" , "J. Bruce Fields" , "David P. Quigley" , Linux NFS list , Linux FS devel list , Linux Security List , SELinux List Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] lnfs: 3.9-rc8 release (take 2) References: <1367240239-19326-1-git-send-email-SteveD@redhat.com> <20130430155740.GX17268@fieldses.org> <1367338308.4260.18.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> In-Reply-To: <1367338308.4260.18.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 30/04/13 12:11, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:57 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:57:02AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> From: Steve Dickson >>> >>> Here is an updated 3.9-rc8 release of >>> the label NFS patches. >> >> The nfsd patches look mergeable to me (with a few one-line fixes). >> >> I'm missing ACKs from Trond and security folks. >> >> The merge window is already open, which is late to be queueing up a >> significant new feature. >> >> It might be reasonable if we could get the needed ACKs now, but more >> likely it looks like 3.11 to me. > > I'm not going to add another 1000 lines of code to the NFS client during > a merge window. Both Linus and Stephen (Rothwell) would throttle me if I > did. > > Let's spend this week on reviewing and making sure that all the issues > that were reported are fixed. I'll cut a new nfs-for-next client branch > as soon as I'm sure that is the case. > Thanks for the cycles! steved.