Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]:50680 "EHLO mail-ie0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754236Ab3DRTPm (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:15:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51703280.03e9440a.06a6.3f9f@mx.google.com> References: <51703280.03e9440a.06a6.3f9f@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:15:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark From: Wendy Cheng To: Spencer Shepler Cc: Yan Burman , "Atchley, Scott" , "J. Bruce Fields" , Tom Tucker , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , Or Gerlitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Spencer Shepler wrote: > > Note that SPEC SFS does not support RDMA. > IIRC, the benchmark comes with source code - wondering anyone has modified it to run on RDMA ? Or is there any real user to share the experience ? -- Wendy > ________________________________ > From: Wendy Cheng > Sent: 4/18/2013 9:16 AM > To: Yan Burman > Cc: Atchley, Scott; J. Bruce Fields; Tom Tucker; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; > linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Or Gerlitz > > Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Yan Burman wrote: >> >> >> What do you suggest for benchmarking NFS? >> > > I believe SPECsfs has been widely used by NFS (server) vendors to > position their product lines. Its workload was based on a real life > NFS deployment. I think it is more torward office type of workload > (large client/user count with smaller file sizes e.g. software > development with build, compile, etc). > > BTW, we're experimenting a similar project and would be interested to > know your findings. > > -- Wendy > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html