Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:62689 "EHLO mail-ie0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935712Ab3DRQQW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:16:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0EE9A1CDC8D6434DB00095CD7DB873462CF9715B@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> References: <0EE9A1CDC8D6434DB00095CD7DB873462CF96C65@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <62745258-4F3B-4C05-BFFD-03EA604576E4@ornl.gov> <0EE9A1CDC8D6434DB00095CD7DB873462CF9715B@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:16:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark From: Wendy Cheng To: Yan Burman Cc: "Atchley, Scott" , "J. Bruce Fields" , Tom Tucker , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , Or Gerlitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Yan Burman wrote: > > > What do you suggest for benchmarking NFS? > I believe SPECsfs has been widely used by NFS (server) vendors to position their product lines. Its workload was based on a real life NFS deployment. I think it is more torward office type of workload (large client/user count with smaller file sizes e.g. software development with build, compile, etc). BTW, we're experimenting a similar project and would be interested to know your findings. -- Wendy