Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx12.netapp.com ([216.240.18.77]:58010 "EHLO mx12.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759995Ab3D3QLv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:11:51 -0400 From: "Myklebust, Trond" To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: Steve Dickson , "J. Bruce Fields" , "David P. Quigley" , Linux NFS list , Linux FS devel list , Linux Security List , SELinux List Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] lnfs: 3.9-rc8 release (take 2) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:11:50 +0000 Message-ID: <1367338308.4260.18.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> References: <1367240239-19326-1-git-send-email-SteveD@redhat.com> <20130430155740.GX17268@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20130430155740.GX17268@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:57 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:57:02AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > From: Steve Dickson > > > > Here is an updated 3.9-rc8 release of > > the label NFS patches. > > The nfsd patches look mergeable to me (with a few one-line fixes). > > I'm missing ACKs from Trond and security folks. > > The merge window is already open, which is late to be queueing up a > significant new feature. > > It might be reasonable if we could get the needed ACKs now, but more > likely it looks like 3.11 to me. I'm not going to add another 1000 lines of code to the NFS client during a merge window. Both Linus and Stephen (Rothwell) would throttle me if I did. Let's spend this week on reviewing and making sure that all the issues that were reported are fixed. I'll cut a new nfs-for-next client branch as soon as I'm sure that is the case. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com www.netapp.com