Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1232 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752642Ab3EMRbI (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2013 13:31:08 -0400 Message-ID: <51912356.4080100@RedHat.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:31:02 -0400 From: Steve Dickson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Myklebust, Trond" CC: "J. Bruce Fields" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: 3.11 patches References: <20130513152312.GB1931@fieldses.org> <1368458889.3563.7.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> In-Reply-To: <1368458889.3563.7.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 13/05/13 11:28, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:23 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> I've added a labeled-nfs-common branch at >> >> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git labeled-nfs-common >> >> with 3.10-rc1 + the one labeled NFS patch shared by client and server >> (with just some protocol constants). >> >> So we can all work on top of that if we want. > > OK. I've pushed out a 'labeled-nfs' branch for the client side that is > based upon the above branch. Momentary I will be posting the 3.10-rc1 forward port. > > Has James added the security patches to a public branch that we can pull > yet? > No and he does not plan to... because "It won't be functional without the security subsystem patches, so they should all be in his tree." Meaning your tree... steved.