Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:29355 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750941Ab3GOHRA (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 03:17:00 -0400 Message-ID: <51E3A1D7.8090901@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:16:39 +0400 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "bfields@fieldses.org" , jlayton@redhat.com CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS inode cache zap on lock - please advice References: <51A6EC86.9010201@parallels.com> <20130530114216.GA11854@fieldses.org> <51A73FA6.30503@parallels.com> <20130712205242.GB10562@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20130712205242.GB10562@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 13.07.2013 00:52, bfields@fieldses.org пишет: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:01:42PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >> >> Thanks, Bruce! >> I'll have at >> >> BTW, do you have any decisions what we will do with UMH tracker? > Crap, apologies, I completely dropped this. Have you looked at it > again lately? Don't worry, it's all right. And I added Jeff and mailing list to recipients. I was thinking about using kernel_thread() instead of kthread_create(). This might work, because will give us kthread with same root and same capabilities as mount caller had. What you, guys, think about it?