Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from aa.linuxbox.com ([69.128.83.226]:4826 "EHLO aa.linuxbox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752010Ab3JDDPQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 23:15:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 23:14:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matt W. Benjamin" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Benny Halevy Message-ID: <1002088145.185.1380856466233.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com> In-Reply-To: <20131003130348.GA9634@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v0 05/49] pnfsd: introduce pnfsd header files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Admittedly, I'm not sure. I'm convinced it will be a big help to have pre-integrated in Ganesha, I was only speculating wrt Linux/knfsd. Matt ----- "Christoph Hellwig" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:58:08AM -0400, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think saying exofs is a proof of concept/toy is missing the > point. > > Exofs is an implementation baseline that provides insight into the > > scalability/performance values that a pnfs implementation can > achieve, > > and potentially how to achieve them. > > Speaking like a true diplomat.. > > What amount of that data are we going to get by merging an exofs > based > pnfs server that we haven't been able to gather with it out of tree > for > the last 6 years? How is merging it and complicating the nfs servers > for it going to provide a benefit outside of the small group of about > a > dozend people that actively care about the T10 OSD support in Linux? > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309