Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.62]:51439 "EHLO
	elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756756Ab3JNPZK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:25:10 -0400
From: "Frank Filz" <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com>
To: "'Weston Andros Adamson'" <dros@netapp.com>
Cc: "'Anna Schumaker'" <schumaker.anna@gmail.com>,
        "'J. Bruce Fields'" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        "'Myklebust, Trond'" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
        <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'Ganesha NFS List'" <nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <1381517062-11267-1-git-send-email-dros@netapp.com> <20131011210104.GD22160@fieldses.org> <525BEDA8.3000309@gmail.com> <07F13874-0BD4-4A90-BB98-B902A8D00065@netapp.com> <02a801cec8f0$b208f200$161ad600$@mindspring.com> <B072FFC7-EB7C-413C-958A-7CB3AED96FEF@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <B072FFC7-EB7C-413C-958A-7CB3AED96FEF@netapp.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] NFS: Add support for multiple sec= mount options
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:25:03 -0700
Message-ID: <02aa01cec8f1$8edd89c0$ac989d40$@mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weston Andros Adamson [mailto:dros@netapp.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: Frank Filz
> Cc: Anna Schumaker; J. Bruce Fields; Myklebust, Trond; <linux-
> nfs@vger.kernel.org>; Ganesha NFS List
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Add support for multiple sec= mount options
> 
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com> wrote:
> 
> >>>>> I wrote a script to verify that I haven't broken anything, it
> >>>>> tests all vers= and sec= combinations against a server with the
> exports:
> >>>>
> >>>> Is the script something that could be added to Anna's or my regular
> >>>> regression testing?
> >>>
> >>> I looked over the script Friday and I don't think it'll be too
> >>> difficult to work in to my Jenkins stuff :)
> >>
> >> I have a new copy of the script that allows (almost) everything to be
> > passed
> >> in as an environment variable.
> >>
> >> I'll hand that off to you later today.
> >
> > Is this script something that would work well with Linux client
> > against an arbitrary server? We will eventually need to test the
> > security negotiation stuff with Ganesha.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> 
> Yes, this script should work well for you. We'll make sure that it's easy
to run
> as a standalone thing too.

Cool, thanks.

Frank