Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:41586 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751774Ab3J2Hjn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:39:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:39:43 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Anna Schumaker Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] NFS: Allow for asynchronous WRITE_PLUS calls Message-ID: <20131029073943.GD10889@infradead.org> References: <1382972418-2249-1-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com> <1382972418-2249-3-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1382972418-2249-3-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:00:17AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > Clients are required to support CB_OFFLOAD for the NFS4_CONTENT_HOLE arm > of the WRITE_PLUS union. This sounds pretty stupid. Just curious, who got this braindamage into the standard?