Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:47565 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752721Ab3JCJzO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 05:55:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 02:55:11 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Benny Halevy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v0 05/49] pnfsd: introduce pnfsd header files Message-ID: <20131003095511.GA30147@infradead.org> References: <20130929114327.GB25750@infradead.org> <52481939.7060405@primarydata.com> <20130929121345.GA21083@infradead.org> <52481B11.2080407@primarydata.com> <20130929122130.GI21083@infradead.org> <20130929123553.GA7510@infradead.org> <20131001203047.GH16245@pad.fieldses.org> <524C0556.9070705@primarydata.com> <20131002160759.GB27988@infradead.org> <524D0873.40602@primarydata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <524D0873.40602@primarydata.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:02:27AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > Just that this is dlm specific logic. > For example, using dlm_ino_hash() in nfsd4_pnfs_dlm_layoutget(). > Or even knowing that > layout->lg_stripe_type = STRIPE_SPARSE; > assumes knowledge of the underlying cluster fs implementation. Which in-tree or soon in-tree filesystem do you care about? And why don't we see pnfs support for it submitted instead of the fairly useless gfs2 support?